2D verses 3D

Packaging obviously needs a combination of structure and graphics to be able to sell, contain and protect a product.

As Papanek (1995 p33) once quoted, “it can be said that the package is the product.

In the world we live in now where supermarkets are packed with row upon row of different brands of the same product, packaging needs to stand out to attract the customer’s attention. What attracts them to a certain product? Is it an interesting structure or graphic?

Certain packaging for example Toblerone is very structural based and has become an iconic shape, if there were no graphics on the pack people would always recognise it. Where as on the other hand a bar of dairy milk is simply recognised by its colours and branding and is quite a generic shape.

Looking at a spectrum of products ranging from value to luxury, it is obvious structure only starts playing an important as the products become more premium, and people spend more time/money choosing which product they wish to buy.

In my first brief I will re-brand Sanex and create two separate designs, one being structural based and one graphic based. Then test the effectiveness of these designs on the appropriate target audience.


One Response to “2D verses 3D”

  1. Jill Says:

    Looking forward to seeing the new designs ;o)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: